Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 N.C. App. 326 - Oltmanns v. Oltmanns

241 N.C. App. 326 - Oltmanns v. Oltmanns’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 Peoples · 210 N.C. App. 1 - Peters v. Pennington · Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'n · Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'n · 136 N.C. App. 420 - Browning v. Helff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The] announcement of judgment in open court merely constitutes the rendition of judgment, not its entry.... Entry of judgment by the trial court is the event which vests jurisdiction in this Court, and the judgment is not complete for the purpose of appeal until its entry. Since entry of judgment is jurisdictional, this Court has no authority to hear an appeal where there has been no entry of judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he written entry of judgment is the controlling event for purposes of appellate review[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “when it is reduced to writing, signed by the judge, and filed with the clerk of court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.