Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 N.C. App. 602 - State v. Martin

241 N.C. App. 602 - State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Olden v. Kentucky · State v. Simpson · State v. Fortney · State v. Younger · State v. Jacobs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he lack of a specific basis under [the Rape Shield Statute] for admission of evidence does not end our analysis”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the sole gauge for determining whether evidence is admissible in rape cases.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he trial court should have looked beyond the four categories to determine whether the evidence was, in fact, relevant to show [complainant's] motive to falsely accuse Defendant and, if so, conducted a balancing test of the probative and prejudicial value of the evidence under Rule 403 or was otherwise inadmissible on some other basis (e.g., hearsay). See State v. Edmonds , 212 N.C.App. at 578 , 713 S.E.2d at 115 (quoting N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 403 (2009) ).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.