Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 N.C. App. 619 - State v. Smith

241 N.C. App. 619 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Kimmelman v. Morrison · State v. Hennis · Bailey v. Noot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Abuse of discretion results where the court's ruling is manifestly unsupported by reason or is so arbitrary that it could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Appellate courts will not second-guess a trial court's exercise of its discretion absent evidence of abuse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “shown. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-144 (2015).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.