Lauenstein v. Lauenstein’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The standard of review for modification of a child support order is de novo on the record, and the decision of the trial court will be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion. Sanchez v. Sanchez, 231 Neb. 963 , 439 N.W.2d 82 (1989). When the evidence is conflicting in a child support modification hearing, this court may give weight to the fact that the trial court observed the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts over another. See, Dobbins v. Dobbins, 226 Neb. 465 , 411 N.W.2d 644 (1987); Graber v. Graber, 220 Neb. 816 , 374 N.W.2d 8 (1985).””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Lodden v. Lodden