Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 NW2D 32 - State v. McNabb

State v. McNabb’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2003

13 state decisions

1201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Monroe · State v. Vietor · State v. Quanrude

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the excess of returns over expenditures in a given transaction or series of transactions”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as a favor to the recipient, something the recipient desires”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Accommodation offense. In a prosecution for unlawful delivery or possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, if the prosecution proves that the defendant violated the provisions of section 204.401, subsection 1 but fails to prove that the defendant delivered or possessed with intent to deliver the controlled substance for the purpose of making a profit, the defendant shall be guilty of an accommodation offense and shall be sentenced as if he had been convicted of a violation of section 204.401, subsection 3. An accommodation offense may be proved as an included offense under a charge of delivering or possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance in violation of section 204.401, subsection 1." (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.