Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 N.Y. 435 - Brigham v. Duany

Brigham v. Duany’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 1987
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1987

12 state decisions

601926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on De Klyn v. . Gould · Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'n · McNulty Bros. v. . Offerman · Gilmour v. . Colcord · Cummings v. . Broadway-94th Street Realty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts and circumstances of the case as found do not imply a contract to pay for the materials furnished. The tenant is not, as such, the agent of the landlord who may” charge him with personal liability for materials ordered for the improvement of the real estate. If the liens are confined to work and materials called for by the lease towards which the landlord is obligated to contribute, the landlord may be said to have made the tenant his agent for the purpose of subjecting the land to the lien of the improvement. (McNulty Bros. v. Offerman, [ 141 A.D. 730 ] 221 N.Y. 98 .) But consent and benefit do not in themselves create an agency or import contractual liability as between the landlord and those who furnish materials on the tenant’s credit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the lienor shall fail, for any reason, to establish a valid lien in an action under the provisions of this article, he may recover judgment therein for such sums as are due him, or which he might recover in an action on a contract, against any party to the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.