State v. Tacker’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1984
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * A magistrate's `determination of probable cause should be paid great deference by reviewing courts.' * * * `A grudging or negative attitude by reviewing courts toward warrants' * * * is inconsistent with the Fourth Amendment's strong preference for searches conducted pursuant to a warrant. `Courts should not invalidate ... warrant[s] by interpreting affidavit[s] in a hypertechnical, rather than a common-sense manner.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"* * * [T]he resolution of doubtful or marginal cases in this area should be largely determined by the preference to be accorded to warrants. * * *" 380 U.S. at 109 , 85 S.Ct. at 746 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.