Cleveland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Willie Lee Miles v. Kw Prunty Attorney General of the State of California · Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, Warden · Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShong · Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental Conservation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to promote the finality of convictions, preserve the sanctity of jury verdicts, minimize the litigation of stale claims, and prevent the unjustified dismissal of a criminal case when reprosecution is not possible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Xavier v. State“direct and insurmountable barrier in front of the courthouse doors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Xavier v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.