Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 Pa. 72 - Funk v. Young

Funk v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 1940
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1940

9 state decisions

301913192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kramer v. Dinsmore · Boyd v. Thompson & Coxe · McNaughton's Appeal · McCleery v. Thompson · Winters v. Mowrer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the settled law of this State that a partner does not have the implied power to bind the persons or separate estates of his non-assenting copartners by a note under seal containing a warrant of attorney authorizing the confession of a judgment thereon. ... A non-signing partner may be liable on a sealed note executed by his copartner by previously authorizing the execution of the note or thereafter ratifying the act”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.