Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 SO3D 999 - State v. Daigle

State v. Daigle’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rippo v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' evidence of actual bias is not necessary to require recusal .' In other words, recusal may be required as a constitutional safeguard against the risk of bias ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “objectively speaking, 'the probability of actual bias on the part of the judge or decisionmaker is too high to be constitutionally tolerable.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.