State v. Daigle’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
February 2020
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rippo v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' evidence of actual bias is not necessary to require recusal .' In other words, recusal may be required as a constitutional safeguard against the risk of bias ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“objectively speaking, 'the probability of actual bias on the part of the judge or decisionmaker is too high to be constitutionally tolerable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.