Taylor v. Buzan’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co. · McDannell & Co. v. Cherry · 1 Tex. Civ. App. 634 - Greer v. Richardson Drug Co. · Evans v. Mills · Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hamrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is conceded that according to the petition the value of plaintiff’s services, for which he sought to recover, was in excess of the jurisdictional -amount. These allegations were made through no mistake or inadvertence, such as a typographical error, or inaccurate calculation. If they had been, the error could.have been corrected by an amended pleading, subject to the trial court’s sound discretion. Railway v. Hamrick [(Tex. Civ. App.) 231 S. W. 166 ] supra; Evans v. Mills, 16 Tex. 196 ; McDannell v. Cherry, 64 Tex. 177 ; Greer v. Drug Co., 1 Tex. Civ. App. 634 , 20 S. W. 1127 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.