Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 Va. 547 - Blunt v. Lentz

Blunt v. Lentz’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ross v. Craw · Great Falls Hardware Co. of Reston v. South Lakes Village Center Associates, Ltd. Partnership · Stamps v. Williamson · Powers v. Howard · Harrington v. Woodfin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the function of the court to construe the contract made by the parties, not to make a contract for them. The question for the court is what did the parties agree to as evidenced by their contract. The guiding light in the construction of a contract is the intention of the parties as expressed by them in the words they have used, and courts are bound to say that the parties intended what the written instrument plainly declares.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.