State v. Badolati’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rochester German Ins. v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co. · Henderson v. Reynolds · Searles v. Averhoff · Walker v. Terrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This gave a satisfactory time standard for a particular community, but was increasingly unsatisfactory as means of transportation and communication improved, because of the wide variety of time standards in communities thrown into close relation by these improvements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State“It is clear to us that the State of Wisconsin has geared its time to Central Standard Time as established by Congress, and that as Congress changes Central Standard Time, our statutory standard of time also changes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“following the lead of the railroads, people in all walks of life adopted generally the time standards of the railroad, but a great many difficulties came up in Court cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.