¶1Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs. The judgment is against an attorney for funds which he withheld from a client. The orders deny attorney’s motion to bring in his former partner and another' as eodefendants. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.
242 A.D. 892
Haflett v. Sebring
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1934
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1934-11-15
Decided 1934-11-15