Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 Ala. 659 - Johnson v. Foust

Johnson v. Foust’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 1986

12 state decisions

4019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Rosenblum · Lewis v. Martin · Richards v. Williams · Williams v. Knight · Stallings v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have not failed to take note of the case of Housing Authority v. Abney , 241 Ala. 256 , 2 So.2d 428 , to the effect that a motion for a new trial timely made and continued suspends the finality of the judgment for the purpose of an appeal. In that case the appeal was taken by the party who had not made the motion for a new trial, and while the court held jurisdiction by reason of the motion by his adversary. In the case of MacMahon v. Dozier , 237 Ala. 574 , 187 So. 710 , the appeal was taken by the party who had made the motion for a new trial, and we held that jurisdiction was thereby withdrawn from the circuit court to act on the motion for a new trial. The effect being that a movant for a new trial can withdraw or dismiss or discontinue his motion and take an appeal, and that if he appeals without doing so, the effect is to discontinue the motion for a new trial, reinstate the judgment and appeal from it, all in one operation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.