242 Cal. App. 2d 606 - King v. Andersen’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 11 Cal. 3d 1 - D'AMICO v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974), 24 Cal. 3d 579 - Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co. (1979)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 220 Cal. App. 2d 463 - Saporta v. Barbagelata · 152 Cal. App. 2d 379 - Whaley v. Fowler · 232 Cal. App. 2d 636 - Aguirre v. Southern Pacific Co. · 165 Cal. App. 2d 640 - Gibson v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sworn evidentiary facts which plaintiff could not possibly withdraw without committing the grossest perjury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“... we are forced to conclude there is no substantial evidence of the existence of a triable issue of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[w]here ... there is a clear and unequivocal admission by the plaintiff, himself, in his deposition'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.