People v. Munoz’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · 57 Cal. 2d 450 - Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court · 19 Cal. 4th 142 - People v. Breverman · 30 Cal. 3d 290 - People v. Watson · 19 Cal. 4th 108 - People v. Birks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when applying the accusatory pleading test to determine whether one offense is necessarily included in another, courts do not look to evidence beyond the actual pleading and its allegations regarding the purported greater offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Alvarez“Thus, Montoya intended its rule not only to apply in the context of multiple convictions, but also in the context of determining whether instructions on a lesser offense were warranted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Alvarez“Here, because the prosecutor objected to the instruction on the crime of [gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated], the trial court correctly denied defendant's request.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Alvarez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.