State v. Garvin’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 district · 206 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 208 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Fagan (2006), State v. Santiago (1998)
2 district · 206 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Alford · Santobello v. New York · Benton v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 208 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is a well established principle that arguments can not be raised for the first time in a reply brief”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A bail bond is a contract between the government and the defendant and his surety.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The Court: I’m going to sentence you on January 6. Understand that? “The Defendant: Yes, sir. “The Court: Now, if I give you more than fifteen [suspended] after eight and three probation, you can take your plea back. Understand that? As long as I give you that sentence you can’t take your plea back by saying I violated the plea agreement. You understand that? “The Defendant: Yes, sir. “The Court: Now, if you don’t show up on January 6, I’m going to order a rearrest, and they are going to come and they will find you, and they’ll arrest you. Now you are charged with failure to appear, you could get five years and, or, $5000 on that. You understand that? “The Defendant: Yes, sir. “The Court: But, I’m not going to be bound by the plea agreement of fifteen years suspended after eight years and three years probation. You understand that? “The Defendant: Yes, sir. “The Court: If you don’t show up, when they catch you, I could give you anywhere from nine months to forty years on the robbery, risk of injury, and the sexual assault second degree, plus you have the failure to appear to worry about. You understand that? “The Defendant: Yes, sir. “The Court: Any misunderstanding about that? “The Defendant: No, sir.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 144-45 n.3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gordon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.