Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 CONN 389 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably State v. Salamon (2008), Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities (2001)

44 state decisions

330199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spring v. Constantino · Frillici v. Town of Westport · United States v. Bubar · Gaines v. Manson · United Illuminating Co. v. City of New Haven

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) Any period of delay resulting from other proceedings concerning the defendant, including but not limited to . . . “(D) the time between the commencement of the hearing on any pretrial motion and the issuance of a ruling on such motion . . . “(2) Any period of delay resulting from the absence or unavailability of the defendant, counsel for the defendant, or any essential witness for the prosecution or defense. . . . “(7) The period of delay resulting from a continuance granted by the judicial authority at the personal request of the defendant. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(d) The trial of such defendant shall commence within eight months from the filing of the information or from the date of the arrest, whichever is later, if the following conditions are met: “(1) the defendant has been continuously incarcerated in a correctional institution of this state pending trial for such offense; and “(2) the defendant is not subject to the provisions of General Statutes § 54-82c. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “important guidelines to the determination of legislative meaning. To permit them to, displace the conclusions that careful interpretation yields, however, would be a disservice to the legislative process, as well as to the judicial exercise of interpreting legislative language based upon the premise that the legislature intends to enact reasonable public policies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.