Securities & Exchange Commission v. Forex Asset Management LLC’s Empirical Analysis
242 F.3d 325 · 2001
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development (2006), Securities and Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp Ltd H (2002)
26 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Marino v. Ortiz · United States v. Chagra · Rosenberg v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“separate from the merits of the SEC's complaint against Forex.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The district court carefully considered the [investors’] arguments and the position of the other fraud victims. Further, the district court determined that the facts did not support a remedy that would elevate the [investors’] claim above the other victims, and accordingly determined that a pro rata distribution would provide a fair and equitable remedy. Thus, the district court used its discretion in a logical way to divide the money, and, therefore, did not abuse its discretion in approving the plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although [appellants] argue that Anderson stands for the proposition that segregated funds should not be subject to a pro rate distribution, we find the court’s holding in Anderson to pivot on the status of the accounts as frozen, rather than the segregated nature of the funds. Therefore, the reasoning applied in Anderson is inapplicable to the present case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.