United States v. McCoy’s Empirical Analysis
242 F.3d 399 · 2001
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · Standard Oil Co of California v. United States · Carbo v. United States · United States v. Saro · United States v. Clements
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“purely opportune ... [if it is] spur of the moment conduct, intended to take advantage of a sudden opportunity.” United States v. Monaco, 23 F.3d 793, 797-98 (3d Cir.1994) (quoting United States v. Rust, 976 F.2d 55, 57 (1st Cir.1992)); see also United States v. Crawford, 407 F.3d 1174, 1180 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. McCoy, 242 F.3d 399, 405 (D.C.Cir.2001); United States v. Lutz, 154 F.3d 581, 590 (6th Cir.1998). . “[S]atisfaction of the repeated acts criterion requires at least three acts over a period of time.” United States v. McCoy, 242 F.3d at 405 (D.C.Cir.2001). .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]o convict her of perjury and then to enhance her sentence on essentially the same conduct is unconstitutional [under] the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“convicted of perjury for statements that she made during a bankruptcy proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.