Gosselin v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
242 F.3d 412 · 2001
Citation profile
9 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Corp. · National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham · Ruiz Rivera v. Riley · Reich v. John Alden Life Insurance · Serapion v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rules such as [Rule 56.1] "were developed by the district courts in this circuit in response to this court’s concern that, absent such rules, summary judgment practice could too easily become a game of cat-and-mouse, giving rise to the 'specter of district court judges being unfairly sandbagged by unadvertised factual issues.’ Such rules are a distinct improvement — and parties ignore them at their peril.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) that the would-be partner has held himself out as a partner; (2) that such holding out was done by the defendant directly or with his consent; (3) that the plaintiff had knowledge of such holding out; and (4) that the plaintiff relied on the ostensible partnership to his prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Lawyers may state or imply that they practice in a partnership or other organization only when that is the fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.