Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 F.3d 52 - The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York Inc v. Soft Drink and Brewery Workers Union Local International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York Inc v. Soft Drink and Brewery Workers Union Local International Brotherhood of Teamsters’s Empirical Analysis

242 F.3d 52 · 2001

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd (2002), Adeleke v. United States (2004)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

370200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here is a strong presumption in favor of arbitration[, and] waiver of the right to arbitration is not to be lightly inferred.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[s]uits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization ... may be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “). In Enterprise Wheel, the Supreme Court set forth the standard of review of an arbitration award issued under a collective bargaining agreement pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.