Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 F.3d 58 - Derek Tolbert v. Queens College the City University of New York Stuart Liebman Helen Smith Cairns Eric Gander

Derek Tolbert v. Queens College the City University of New York Stuart Liebman Helen Smith Cairns Eric Gander’s Empirical Analysis

242 F.3d 58 · 2001

Citation profile

251
cited by 251 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 251 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Patterson v. County of Oneida (2004), SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp. (2006)

64 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

1290200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 251 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion was made and to give that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences that the jury might have drawn in his favor from the evidence. The court cannot assess the weight of conflicting evidence, pass on the credibility of the witnesses, or substitute its judgment for that of the jury.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is a settled appellate rule that issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he court should give credence to the evidence favoring the nonmovant as well as that evidence supporting the moving party that is uncontradicted and unimpeached, at least to the extent that that evidence comes from disinterested witnesses.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.