Gowell v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
242 F.3d 793 · 2001
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Polaski v. Heckler · Browning v. Sullivan · Woolf v. Shalala · Prosch v. Apfel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he real issue is how severe the pain is.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'of or relating to the fascia surrounding and separating muscle tissue.' Stedman’s Medical Dictionary 1168 (26th ed.1995). 'Fascia' is a ‘sheet of fibrous tissue that envelops the body beneath the skin; it also encloses muscles and groups of muscles, and separates their several layers or groups.' Id. at 628 .” Gowell v. Apfel, 242 F.3d 793 , 795 n. 3 (8th Cir.2001). 4 . The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but enough so that a reasonable mind might accept it as adequate to support a conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Osborne v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.