Avjian v. Weast’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1414 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Education · Town of Burlington v. Department of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court did not err in accepting the factual findings of the ALJ [where] the majority of facts relied upon by the ALJ were supported by the record through corroborating documents, letters, and witness testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. A.H. v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.