Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

242 F. App'x 908

In re Knight

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2007

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-06-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-06-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Rayford Knight petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for return of property. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, because the district court has ruled on Knight’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2PETITION DENIED.

/242/fappx/908 · .json · Public domain