Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 FSUPP 746 - Vendetti v. Schuster

Vendetti v. Schuster’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1996

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1001965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447

Relies on Barr v. Matteo · England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners · Gregoire v. Biddle · Stoner v. California · Gerling v. Baltimore Ohio R Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) A civil action or criminal prosecution commenced in a State court against any of the following persons may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) Any officer of the United States or any agency thereof, or person acting under him, for any act under color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue. (2) A property holder whose title is derived from any such officer, where such action or prosecution affects the validity of any law of the United States.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Having thus on its own initiative submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the state court, and having unsuccessfully tried there an issue, which, if successfully maintained, would have resulted in a dismissal of the action, the defendant elected its forum; and, having made the election, it cannot thereafter be allowed to remove the case to the federal court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.