242 Ill. App. 3d 10 - Stewart v. Thrasher’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably 328 Ill. App. 3d 696 - Schrager v. North Community Bank (2002), 295 Ill. App. 3d 567 - Neptuno Treuhand-Und Verwaltungsgesellschaft Mbh v. Arbor (1998)
4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 63 Ill. 2d 128 - First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp. · 91 Ill. 2d 69 - Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co. · 92 Ill. 2d 171 - Redarowicz v. Ohlendorf · Gerill Corp. v. Jack L. Hargrove Builders, Inc. · 181 Ill. App. 3d 513 - Stone v. City of Arcola
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order to prove the concealment amounted to a fraudulent misrepresentation^] the plaintiff must prove: (1) the concealment of a material fact; (2) the concealment was intended to induce a false beUef, under circumstances creating a duty to speak ...; (3) the innocent party could not have discovered the truth through a reasonable inquiry or inspection, or was prevented from making a reasonable inquiry or inspection, and relied upon the silence as a representation that the fact did not exist; (4) the concealed information was such that the injured party would have acted differently had he been aware of it; and (5) that reliance by the person from whom the fact was concealed led to his injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(1) a false statement of material fact; (2) that the party making the statement knew the statement was false or believed it to be untrue; (3) the party to whom the statement was made had a right to rely on that statement and did, in fact, rely on it; (4) the statement was made for the purpose of inducing the other party to act; and (5) that reliance by the person to whom the statement was made led to his injury. [Citation.]” Stewart v. Thrasher, 242 Ill. App. 3d 10, 15-16 , 610 N.E.2d 799, 803 (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Negligent misrepresentation involves a breach of the duty to use due care in obtaining and communicating information upon which others may reasonably be expected to rely in the conduct of their economic affairs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.