In re Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Davitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. Respondent failed to preserve the identity of funds belonging to his clients, Richard Dansel and David Dansel, in that he deposited funds belonging to them in his personal and business account along with funds belonging to Respondent, and not in a separate account designated for clients’ funds, in violation of DR 9-102(A) [1987 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 123]. “2. Respondent engaged in conduct involving dishonesty in utilizing his clients’ funds for his personal and business purposes without the consent of his clients, in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) [1987 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 123].””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.