Roper v. Roper’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Orr Ex Rel. Walton v. Orr (1939), Johansen v. State (1971)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rudd v. Rudd · Adams v. Gardner · Franck v. Franck · Sebastian v. Rose · Hembree v. Hembree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Punishment of the husband or father for contempt on this account is a remedial process, often the only effective one to secure a wife and child the maintenance that has been awarded them, and is necessary to the administration of justice. It is not an imprisonment for debt, strictly speaking.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hall v. Hall · Boden v. McCoy““Failure to comply with a decree is prima facie evidence of contempt; hence the burden is on the divorced husband to show his inability, and that is a question of fact to be determined by all the evidence. It is the general rule that, where a husband has defaulted in the payments ordered by the court to be made because he is unable to do so, he will not be adjudged in contempt for disobedience unless he is in fault or had voluntarily created his disability.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Knight v. Knight““ * * * To have purged himself of contempt for his failure to comply with the court’s orders he must have made it clearly appear, not only that he was unable to comply therewith, but also that his inability was not caused by his own neglect or misconduct.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Knight v. Knight
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.