Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 Md. 350 - Brooks v. Bast

Brooks v. Bast’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Butler v. Daum (1967), Fagnani v. Fisher (2011)

36 state decisions

130196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Trust Co. v. Biggs · Preske v. Carroll · Thanos v. Mitchell · Sawyer v. Novak · DeTamble v. Adkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the advertisement is sufficient if it describes the property so that it can be located by the exercise of ordinary intelligence and so that more detailed information concerning it could be obtained, if desired ... (2) that failure to mention or fully describe the nature and extent of improvements ... will not vitiate the sale unless the exceptant meets his burden of overcoming the presumption of validity of a judicial sale by showing that the omission was prejudicial to the sale of the property at a fair and adequate sum, and that a resale would be likely to produce a greater amount.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.