Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 Mich. 419 - Shrager v. Rich

Shrager v. Rich’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 1947
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1947

9 state decisions

30192819301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hosey v. Ionia Circuit Judge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In cases of appeal from a circuit court commissioner or the justice’s court, the party appealing shall serve notice of the appeal upon counsel for the opposite party in the court below, if the opposite party had counsel in the court below, or if not, then such notice shall he served upon the opposite party personally or by mail in the manner provided for service upon attorneys by mail, within five days after the return on appeal is filed in the office of the county clerk.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘ ‘ The statute requiring notice to the adverse party is mandatory, and, until the party is given such notice, the circuit court has no jurisdiction over the parties to the record. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.