242 Mich. App. 306 - Harris v. Vernier’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Circuit courts have original jurisdiction to hear and determine all civil claims and remedies, except where exclusive jurisdiction is given in the constitution or by statute to some other court or where the circuit courts are denied jurisdiction by the constitution or statutes of this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“We review a trial court's decision on a motion for summary disposition based on MCR 2.116(C)(4) de novo to determine if the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, or if affidavits or other proofs demonstrate there is an issue of material fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that a party's assertion of the exclusive remedy provision of [Michigan's WCA] is a direct challenge to the trial court's subject-matter jurisdiction, not within the scope of the waiver”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.