Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 MINN 521 - Beebe v. Kleidon

Beebe v. Kleidon’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. (1956), Boland v. Morrill (1965)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 25 state decisions

1201954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Estate of Forsythe · Carlson v. Fredsall · Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co. · Hardy v. Anderson · Lambrecht v. Schreyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * To come within this exception to the hearsay rule, the declaration must follow a startling occasion; it must be made before there is time for the declarant to reflect upon the impacts of the statement; and it must relate to the startling occasion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hase v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.
  2. ““* * * Neither can such testimony qualify as a statement against interest since evidence is admissible under that exception to the hearsay rule only when the declarant is deceased at the time of trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Johnson v. Sleizer
  3. “the existence or nonexistence of implied consent was a jury question. Implied consent may be drawn from all the facts and circumstance of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Safeco Insurance Companies v. Diaz

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.