Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 N.C. 324 - Hardison v. Gregory

Hardison v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
August 1978
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 1978

19 state decisions

80195519601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Salley v. Fayetteville Coca-Cola Bottling Co. · Dobias v. White · Collins v. . Lamb · State v. . Gordon · Davis v. . Pearson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Apparently we have no case directly on all fours, but we have a number of cases that sustain the proposition that G.S. 8-51 does not prohibit an interested party from testifying as to the acts and conduct of the deceased, where the interested party is merely an observer — in other words as to independent facts based upon independent knowledge, not derived from any personal transaction or communication with the deceased. (Numerous citations.) ❖ * ❖ Our cases hold that an interested party is not prohibited by G.S. 8-51 from testifying concerning his independent acts. (Citations.) * # * It is to be noted that plaintiff gave no testimony as to any words spoken on the three occasions. Applying the principles of law stated above to the facts, we conclude that the plaintiff was competent to testify as to what he saw the deceased Bonnie M. Gregory do and his conduct on the three occasions set forth, because he was testifying as to independent facts based upon independent knowledge, not derived from any personal transaction or communication with the deceased.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is not necessary to show the adultery by direct proof, but circumstances are sufficient for that purpose, if therefrom the jury can reasonably infer the guilt of the parties.” Powell v. Strickland, 163 N.C. 393 , 79 S.E. 872 . See also Hardison v. Gregory, 242 N.C. 324 , 88 S.E. 2d 96 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.