Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

242 N.C. 761

89 S.E.2d 463

State v. Mintz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1955

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1955-10-19

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1982

6 state decisions

Relies on State v. . Spivey

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1955-10-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PeR CuRiam.

¶1 G.S. 14-177 defines the crime against nature as an “abominable and detestable” crime, and we held in & v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1, that an attempt to commit the crime thus defined is an infamous act within the meaning of G.S. 14-3. We still adhere to that decision. Hence the sentence imposed in the court below was within the limitations permitted by law.

¶2 The other exceptive assignments of error present no substantial question which requires discussion. They fail to point out prejudicial error. Therefore, in .the trial below we find

¶3 No error.

/242/nc/761 · .json · Public domain