242 N.C. App. 347 - State v. Saldierna’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Davis v. United States · State v. Cooke · Schwartz v. Pennsylvania · Feist v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the juvenile is less than 16 years of age, no in-custody admission or confession resulting from interrogation may be admitted into evidence unless the confession or admission was made in the presence of the juvenile's parent, guardian, custodian, or attorney.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]hat the State carried its burden by a preponderance of the evidence that [d]efendant knowingly, willingly, and understandingly waived his juvenile rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“triggers a requirement for the interviewing officer to clarify the juvenile's meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.