242 N.J. Super. 240 - State v. Fiola’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1301 (Charity Games Advertising Clarification Act of 1988) · 18 U.S.C. § 1953
Relies on Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees · Kugler v. Romain · Western Union Telegraph Co. v. New Jersey · MAYOR, & C., OF ALPINE BOROUGH v. Brewster · People Ex Rel. Bennett v. Laman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“involve[d] the solicitation and receipt of money in New Jersey for the purchase of lottery tickets issued by other states, the transport of money to other states to purchase lottery tickets and the return of the tickets to New Jersey for delivery to customers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“transport of gambling requests and money to out-of-state gambling sites and the return of lottery tickets to New Jersey gamblers `materially aids [a] form of gambling activity' within the intent of N.J.S.A. 2C:37-2(a)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“possession of lottery tickets for distribution to their customers violates N.J.S.A. 2C:37-2(a)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.