Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

242 N.Y. 568

152 N.E 430

Roman v. Lobe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1926

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1926-03-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1947

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 In view of the fact, which is now pointed out to us upon this motion for reargument, that the defendant’s answer admits the employment of the plaintiff and his procurement of the sale, the judgment of the Appellate Division must have been based upon the holding that a license was essential, since no other issue was presented by the pleadings.

¶2 A reargument will be granted to the end that the constitutionality of the statute (Real Prop. Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 50], § 442-e) may be considered and determined.

¶3 Pursuant to section 68 of the Executive Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 18), the plaintiff is directed to give notice to the Attorney-General of the argument of this appeal and the questions to be raised thereon.

¶4 Motion for reargument granted.

/242/ny/568 · .json · Public domain