Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 Or. 101 - State v. Foster

State v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 1998
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1998

12 state decisions

801965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * It is generally held that pre-trial discovery of the state's evidence is not permissible. 6 Wigmore, Evidence (3d ed. 1940), § 1859, pages 475, 476.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * previous written statement of a witness should be made available to defendant for possible impeachment on cross-examination of the witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.