Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 P.3d 921 - State v. Leyerle

State v. Leyerle’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · Waller v. Georgia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County · Washington v. Recuenco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Presley speaks in broad terms, drawing on the Supreme Court's First and Sixth Amendment precedent to hold that when a trial court closes voir dire it must first apply Waller's closure criteria and the failure to do so requires reversal. See Presley, 130 S.Ct. at 724-25 (applying [ Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 , 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984)] and [ Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501 , 104 S.Ct. 819 , 78 L.Ed.2d 629 (1984)]).[ [7] ]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The open trial thus plays as important a role in the administration of justice today as it did for centuries before our separation from England. The value of openness lies in the fact that people not actually attending trials can have confidence that standards of fairness are being observed; the sure knowledge that anyone is free to attend gives assurance that established procedures are being followed and that deviations will become known. Openness thus enhances both the basic fairness of the criminal trial and the appearance of fairness so essential to public confidence in the system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[ State v. ] Bone-Club [, 128 Wash.2d 254 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995)] `five-step closure test' is essentially a restatement and adoption of the federal closure criteria expressed in Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 , 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed.2d 31 (1984).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.