Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 PASUPER 388 - Commonwealth v. Williams

Commonwealth v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1982
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Commonwealth v. Martin · Commonwealth v. Canales · Commonwealth v. Cost

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the absence of any indication of confusion on [appellant’s] part, or any suggestion that his unwillingness to make a statement was a sudden change of mind, a conclusion that his unwillingness to sign anything reflected ignorance of the consequences of an oral statement, with nothing more, would be purely speculative. Commonwealth v. Williams, [242 Pa.Superior Ct. 388, 363 A.2d 1326 (1976) ]”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.