Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

242 So. 2d 780

Dunn v. Baessler

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1970

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1970-11-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1971

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1970-11-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, it is our opinion that neither appellant nor the appellees who cross-assigned error have demonstrated reversible *781error; therefore, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

¶2Affirmed.

REED, J., and COOPER, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.
WALDEN, Judge

¶3(dissenting).

¶4It is my view that the trial court erred in its disposition of Count IV of Plaintiff’s -amended complaint.

¶5I,therefore, dissent.

/242/so2d/780 · .json · Public domain