Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

242 So. 3d 1205

Eustace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2018-05-04

Relies on Reji Smith v. State

Decided 2018-05-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener's error. See Daniels v. State , 200 So.3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause for correction of the order.

¶2AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

¶3COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

/242/so3d/1205 · .json · Public domain