Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 S.W.3d 1 - Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.

Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

172
cited by 172 later decisions
19
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 5 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 172 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London (2010), Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Nokia, Inc. (2008)

31 federal appellate · 5 district · 64 state decisions — followed in 19 states

1280200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Keller v. Wilson · Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc. · KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp. · Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp. · Helena Chemical Co. v. Wilkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 172 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a. Physical injury to tangible property, including all resulting loss of use of that property. All such loss of use shall be deemed to occur at the time of the physical injury that caused it; or b. Loss of use of tangible property that is not physically injured. All such loss of use shall be deemed to occur at the time of the "occurrence” that caused it.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a. We will pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of “bodily injury” or “property damage” to which this insurance applies. We will have the right and duty to defend the insured against any “suit” seeking those damages. However, we will have no duty to defend the insured against any “suit” seeking damages for “bodily injury” or “property damage” to which this insurance does not apply.... b. This insurance applies to “bodily injury” and “property damage” only if: (1) The “bodily injury” or “property damage” is caused by an “occurrence” that takes place in the “coverage territory”....”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This policy does not apply to ... 'Property Damage' to 'Your Work' arising out of it or any part of it and included in the 'Products/Completed Operations Hazard.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.