Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 242 U.S. 307 - Williams v. Cobb

Williams v. Cobb’s Empirical Analysis

242 U.S. 307 · 1916

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
October 1954
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1954 · most notably Forrest v. Jack (1935), Gift v. Love (1932)

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions

25019161920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedWilliams v. Cobb (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Leitch v. . Wells · Appeal of Grim · Lamberton v. Pereles · Upon the Petition of Gay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At common law * * * an, executor has full power, without any special provision of the will that he is administering or order of court, to sell or dispose of the personal assets of the estate, and thereby to pass good title to them. Munteith v. Rahn, 14 Wis. 210 ; In re Gay, 5 Mass. 419 ; Leitch v. Wells, 48 N. Y. 585 ; Perry on Trusts, §§ 225, 809. A sale by an executor, even to himself, is not void, hut only voidable at the option of interested persons. Grim’s Appeal, 105 Pa. St. 375 ; Tate v. Dalton, 41 N. C. 562 . And if, after such purchase from himself, an executor sells to another, the purchaser from him acquires a good title. Cannon v. Jenkins, 16 N. C. 426 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.