Krodel v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2000
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Conley v. Gibson · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as the court put it. ADEA Opinion at 31. Yet he could not offer any specific reason as to why he recommended her on either direct or cross-examination; indeed he repeatedly stated that he did not recall Pronovost's work. The district court also noted that Ogden had testified under oath at least three times before the trial (in administrative hearings in 1978 and 1980, and in a deposition in 1982) and that on each prior occasion he admitted that he could not recall Pronovost's actual performance. See id. at 31-32.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Krodel v. Young“standard of review established in Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Pullman-Standard, Inc. v. Swint, 456 U.S. 273 , 288, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 1789, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982); Aikens, 103 S.Ct. at 1485. The district court's ADEA ruling in this case can thus only be overturned if the court committed legal error or if we are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Krodel v. Young“Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), and we cannot overturn the district court's reading of Ogden on the cold record before us. Similarly, the district court specifically noted the plaintiff's possible deficiencies as an employee, see ADEA Opinion at 16-17, and there is no indication that the court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Krodel v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.