Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 A2D 703 - Herhal v. State

Herhal v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2006

1 district · 15 state decisions

10019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Jenkins v. State · Ruffin v. State · Parson v. State · Porter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The circumstantial evidence against Herhal in this case, if believed, may be found inconsistent with any rational conclusion other than guilt of second degree murder. The prayer for judgment of acquittal, therefore, was properly denied by the Superior Court.” ( 243 A.2d at 706 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.