Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 243 Ala. 1 - Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

223
cited by 223 later decisions
4
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 219 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 223 later decisions — most recently December 1994 · most notably Fuller v. State (1959), Stokley v. State (1950)

4 federal appellate · 219 state decisions

580194219501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. States · New York Life Insurance v. Gamer · Roan v. State · Parrish v. State · Hornsby v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 223 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Court instructs the jury that the defendant, Steve Thomas, should not be convicted, unless the evidence in this case excludes to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis but that of his guilt; no matter how strong the circumstances are they do not come up to the full measure of proof which the law requires if they can be reasonably reconciled with the theory that Steve Thomas is innocent."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““1. The Court charges the jury that if, after considering all the evidence in the case, that tending to show guilt, together with that tending to show innocence, there should spring up involuntarily in the minds of the jury from any part of the evidence, a probability of the innocence of the - defendant, the jury must acquit.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Court charges the jury that the legal presumption of innocence is to be regarded by the jury in every case as a matter of evidence, to the benefit of which the accused is entitled, and, as a matter of evidence, attends the accused until his guilt is, by the evidence placed beyond a reasonable doubt.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.